When the Declaration of Independence
was written, and its sister document, the Constitution, the need for
Union among the States was great. Joined in Union, the States proved
better able to effect their independence, and to stand strong
collectively, a dozen-odd entities working together against the many
pressures that faced our young nation as it fought to make a place
for itself in the world, and to prove that its shockingly progressive
ideals had staying-power.
Then, halfway through the 19th
century, divergent forces and interests among the States compelled
them to split apart into two separate nations, one seeking to
maintain a slave-based economy, the other seeking, officially, to
maintain the Union. Whole populations that no longer felt that they
should be following the same path rose up in conflict, two seemingly
foreign peoples that understood that they had grown simply too far
apart in thought and in method to be able to stay together. In those
times of relative national weakness and persistent internal turmoil,
the Union held; it has held through two world wars, scores of other
police-actions (including Vietnam, Afghanistan 2001, Iraq 2003), and
rapid and widespread cultural and societal transformations both here
and abroad.
Today, however, we have witnessed the
ascendancy of a federal supremacy over the states, and within that
supremacy the elevation of the executive branch (in clear violation
of the checks and balances built into the Constitution), as well as
growing divergences between the citizens who live in roughly the same
areas as those that split asunder in the 1860s. Two loose but still
recognizable camps have formed in this nation, with millions of
voters hovering at varying degrees around the edges of each, one camp
calling for more punitive and dogmatic responses to our problems, a
camp that relies on the gullibility of the masses for the propagation
of its conservative views on religion and society, the other camp one
that strives at least superficially for rational debate, the
reinstatement of the constitutional right to liberty, and a more
compassionate and socialistic view of the role that government and
society must play in the elevation of the American People and in the
bringing about of our Safety and Happiness. (It would be convenient
to suppose that I am here referring to Republicans and Democrats
respectively, but as these parties have become the necessary
repositories of most anyone seeking political office, their ranks are
as varied in their opinions as is the greater population, which is
split roughly between liberals and conservatives, i.e. between those
who seek to propagate liberty through rational debate and those who
seek to maintain the status quo through Fear Of The Unknown and an
inflexible mind-set. In my opinion, open debate and rational thinking
are essential to the propagation of liberty, for the concept of
liberty presupposes that the individual is capable of deciding for
himself how best to lead his life: it demands of him that he
understands the consequences of his actions while allowing him to
live a virtuous life devoid of willful violations of the life,
liberty, or property of his fellow persons.)
Perhaps it would be best, then, in
this time of America's military supremacy around the world (when no
danger is clear and present enough to enact our total destruction),
in this era of seemingly irreconcilable rhetoric and clear societal,
moral, and religious divergence, to conclude with this chapter of our
experiment and, as the Union of all States is no longer absolutely
necessary for the basic preservation of our nation, to allow those
portions that wish to pursue their own course to secede.
Since our country's inception, we
have added a good number of states, in locations sometimes far-flung
from our original borders, states that by their isolation are seen
even now as distant lands and foreign peoples whose primary binding
characteristic is the feeble, cancer-like presence of the homogenized
corporate retail location. In the interest of DomesticTranquility, it would be better to allow those who wished to
establish a socially conservative nation based on a particular
religion where they might better keep the ignorant in Fear, a place
where the individual might not have the right to decide for herself
how to affect her body (by tattoo, weight-loss, or abortion), where
the benefits of the joining of individuals in marriage or civil union
would be bestowed only according to the writings of a specific
religious text (and not to homosexuals or to couples of different
hues), where a specific language might be declared (the USA haveno official language), and where a specific system of beliefs
might be recognized by all, unanimously, as the state religion.
Perhaps the citizens of America
should be asked directly if they feel that these two clearly
divergent populations should become separate nations, an official
poll to gauge the possibility of such a split, even an outright vote
for their fragmentation and reintegration as separate nations
according to the wishes of the respective majorities. (These new
nations would have to be well-established, sovereign states with
clearly demarcated borders, their constitutions well-written, with
provisions in place for the unobstructed movement of goods and people
between them, especially people who decide, within a set amount of
time, that they had made a mistake and would like to switch nations.)
The essence of liberty that flowered
in America and in the world during the 1960s was stamped out in this
country for a number of reasons, among them conservatism, Fear of the
Unknown, war-mongering, and racism. Chief among these reasons,
however, was the passage of legislation prohibiting the use,
possession, and distribution of mood altering substances such as
marijuana, legislation that to this day continues to violate the
liberty of the American People by restricting their ability to obtain
and use legally those substances that they deem would best assist
them in their pursuit of Happiness.
Until such time as the citizens of
America are granted their constitutional rights to life, liberty, and
property; until such time as their right to abort unwanted fetuses
and to use whichever substance they decide are best and to marry
whomever they please; until such time as the citizens are entrusted
fully with their unalienable right to choose for themselves how best
to lead their lives and they regain the right to pursue their
Happiness as they decide is best; until that time, liberty does not
abide in these United States, and the rights enumerated in the
Constitution are null and void. (If any one portion of the
Constitution becomes null and void, the entire Constitution must be
considered null and void.)
Certain constitutional protections (against unwarranted searches and seizures) continue to be violated courtesy of the Patriot Act. Similarly, enforcement of the Controlled Substances Act violates the individual's fifth and fourteenth Amendment right to property, because her body is her only true property, and she can do with her property whatever she wants, so long as she is not harming anyone else's property. Since some of the most fundamental rights and protections our Constitution was supposed to have provided continue to be withheld from the American people, we must assume that our Constitution is no longer functioning as intended, that is has been so abused and mocked that it more resembles a nice thing to read on a sunny afternoon than a bedrock legal document. With this our finest document already torn, tattered, and violated, with our most basic rights and protections reduced to the theoretical, we would do well to allow those seeking liberty to break off from those seeking to cling fearfully to the mistakes of the past, that a new Union based solidly on the principles set forth by our nation's forefathers might be formed, a new nation that would not rest until the Blessings of Liberty were guaranteed to ourselves and our Posterity, equally and without undue restriction.
Let the religious zealots thump their
holy books and legislate according to their morality, in their own
nation, while they funnel the wealth of their people into the pockets
of the richest one percent. We rational, progressive, compassionate
few, we who yearn for liberty, we who would like to affect our bodies
and to pursue our Happiness as we see fit, our Safety protected by
the might of the Declaration, our rights as enumerated in the
Constitution immutable and unalienable now, and forever.
Only through constant vigilance and
rational foresight can we ensure Liberty and Justice for all. Stand
up. Speak out. Demand your constitutional rights. While this struggle
may seem nearly over, we have not yet begun to fight.
Ultima Ratio Regum - 場黑麥 John Paul Roggenkamp
No comments:
Post a Comment